About mistakes, misinformation and lies in the Russian Wikipedia on the example of the article “Socionics”

Authors

  • Victor Antoshkin
  • O. Arinicheva
  • V. Berdutin
  • Aleksandr Bukalov
  • et al

Keywords:

socionics, Wikipedia, arbitrariness, personality types, science, authoritative sources

Abstract

The article of a number of scientists from different countries shows that the principles of editing the “people's” encyclopedia “Wikipedia” contain fatal defects, since articles in it are usually written not by specialists, but by amateurs who, by definition, cannot have the proper qualifications. That is why in all educational and scientific institutions of all countries of the world it is forbidden to refer to Wikipedia. As an example, the situation with the article “Socionics” in the Russian Wikipedia is considered, which not only contains false and erroneous statements, but even the fundamental principles and rules of Wikipedia itself are completely violated. In particular, dozens of authoritative sources that define socionics as a long-established academic science or scientific direction are completely ignored and discarded. Also, sections on the numerous application of socionic methods in practice are completely absent or thrown out - in manned space exploration, civil aviation, management, pedagogy, psychotherapy, sports, linguistics, didactics, family counseling, etc. At the same time, a group of participants in the Russian Wikipedia, who seized control over editing, shows open aggression towards any attempts to correct the situation, indefinitely blocking all those who disagree with such actions and extends his vandalism attempts to the English version of Wikipedia.

References

Крысько В. Словарь-справочник по социальной психологии. - СПб.: Питер, 2003. - С. 310. - ISBN 5-314-00021-0.

Жуков С. Стать космонавтом! - М., 2011.

Букалов А.В., Карпенко О.Б. Соционика как академическая научная дисциплина. // Соционика, ментология и психология личности. — 2013. — №№ 1–2. — URL: http://socionic.info/pdf/soc-academ.pdf.

Шкавро З.Н. Методы соционики в диссертационных работах // Менеджмент и кадры: психология управления, соционика и социология. — 2014. — № 8. — С. 34–50. —URL: https://publishing.socionic.info/management/article/view/474/410.

Самойлова И.Г. Интегральный тип информационного метаболизма малой группы в производственной организации. — Диссертация, Ярославский университет, научный рук. д.п.н. Новиков В. В., 1996.

Букалов А.В., Карпенко О.Б. Соционика и психоинформационные технологии в образовательном процессе // Материалы международной научной конференции XVII ЦАРСКОСЕЛЬСКИЕ ЧТЕНИЯ. — СПб: Изд-во Ленинград. гос. ун-т, 2013.

Published

2023-03-28

How to Cite

Antoshkin, V., Arinicheva, O., Berdutin, V., Bukalov, A., & et al д. (2023). About mistakes, misinformation and lies in the Russian Wikipedia on the example of the article “Socionics”. Socionics, Mentology and Personality Psychology, (1-2), 57–61. Retrieved from https://publishing.socionic.info/index.php/socionics/article/view/2888

Issue

Section

Articles