The cosmophysical intellectual hologram in the modeled “Kozirev space”
Keywords:
“Kozirev mirrors”, distant information transmission, energy-information hologram, alive matterAbstract
It is described the experiments on the distant translation o information, presented on a film and connected with the 28 objects of the geological, biological and artificial origination. The information transmission was produced using the laser technology in “Kozirev mirror”. It was detected that under the phase transitions in photoemulsion6 occurred in the “Kozirev space”, it is possible the reproduction of information, produced by material objects, which are the withesses of different epochs and cultures. This information was perceived by people, remoted on the dozens kilometers from the mentioned objects. At the same time the polygraph reproduction information was not perceived. Under the experiments in the “Kozirev mirror” space it was observed a set of unusual optical effects, registrated on a film, including the phenomenon of the metal mirrors temporary transparentness.
References
:
Ascheulov A. A., Dobrovol’skij YU. G., Bezulik V. A. Issledovanie spinotorsionnogo vozdejstviya na parametry poluprovodnikovykh priborov // Soznanie i fiz. real’nost’. — 2001. — T. 6. — № 1. — S. 27–30.
Bukalov A. V. Izmenenie sostoyaniya soznaniya i transpersonal’naya psikhologiya // Fizika soznaniya i zhizni, kosmologiya i astrofizika. — 2001. — № 4. — S. 9–19.
Bukalov A. V. O vozmozhnosti suschestvovaniya polevykh form zhizni // Fizika soznaniya i zhizni, kosmologiya i astrofizika. — 2001. — № 4. — S. 5–8.
Gindilis L. M. Astrosotsiologiсheskij paradoks v probleme SETI // Astronomiya i sovremennaya kartina mira. — M.: In-t filosofii RAN, 1996. — S. 155–171.
Zakurko L. V., Lukantsov S. A., SHelokhvostov V. P., Ivanov V. P. Metod vizualizatsii energoinformatsionnykh kharakteristik polevykh analogov preparatov // Tr. Tambov, gos. tekhn. un-ta. — 2000. — Vyp. 5. — S. 183–186.
Kaznaсheev V. P., Trofimov A. V. Oсherki o prirode zhivogo veschestva i intellekta na planete Zemlya. — Novosibirsk: «Nauka», 2004. — 312 s.
Nikolaev G. V. Skalyarnoe magnitnoe pole. — Tomsk, 1996. — 1550 s.
Plokhotnikov K. E. Psikhofizika: k teorii vzaimodejstviya operatora s ustrojstvom, matematiсheskaya model’// Soznanie i fiziсheskaya real’nost’. — 2000. — T. 5. — № 5. — S. 2–13.
Pon’ko V. A. Modelirovanie geokosmiсheskikh svyazej v sisteme «Ekoprognoz» // Bol’shaya medveditsa. — 2000. — T. 1. — S. 64–65.
Pribram K. YAzyki mozga. Eksperimental’nye paradoksy i printsipy nejropsikhologii: Per. s angl. — M.: Progress, 1975. — 464 s.
Troitskij B. C. Vnezemnye tsivilizatsii i opyt // Astronomiya i sovremennaya kartina mira. — M.: In-t filosofii RAN, 1996. — S. 177–188.
Trofimov A. V. O nekotorykh nablyudeniyakh v informatsionnom prostranstve planety // Vestn. MNIIKA. — 2001. — № 8. — S. 61-67.
Filimonov V. A. Novaya kontseptsiya nejtrino: nejtrino kak kvant torsionnogo izluсheniya // Pis’ma v FMR. — 2000. — № 3. — S. 89–92.
Bohm D. A new theory of the relationship of mind and body // J. Amer. Soc. Psych. Res. — 1986. — Vol. 80. — № 2. — P. 113–135.
Smith C. W. Is a living system a macroscopic quantum system? // Frontier Perspectives. — 1998. — Vol. 7. — N 1. — P. 9–15.
