"Arrogance" socionists in relation to psychologists and highly-"dimensionality" of socionics in relation to psychology

Authors

  • Igor Litvinenko

Keywords:

socionics, psychology, outlook, methodology, the theory, practice, dimensionality of FIM, parametres of FIM

Abstract

It is compared psychological and socionic methodology through concept of the dimensionality of functions of informational metabolism (FIM). The conclusion about world outlook and methodological advantage of socionics in comparison with psychology that leads to difficulty of dialogue between their subjects becomes.

References

Букалов А. В. Структура и размерность функций информационного метаболизма. // Соционика, ментология и психология личности. — 1995. — № 2.

Ермак В. Д. Типоведение и соционика // Соционика, ментология и психология личности. — 1999. №6.

Ломов Б. Ф. Методологические и теоретические проблемы психологии. — М.: Наука, 1984. — 444 с.

Лытов Д. А. Диалог с коллегами: на каких условиях? — Ч.2.: Соционика и психологи // Социони-ка, ментология и психология личности. — 2003. — №6.

Шепетько Е. В. Проблемы соционики и социоников // Соционика, ментология и психология лич-ности. — 2003. — №6.

How to Cite

Litvinenko, I. (2007). "Arrogance" socionists in relation to psychologists and highly-"dimensionality" of socionics in relation to psychology. Socionics, Mentology and Personality Psychology, (4), 68–72. Retrieved from https://publishing.socionic.info/index.php/socionics/article/view/1841

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >>